I am seeing headlines that indicate certain areas around the San Francisco Bay are no longer in drought conditions. This is not a state wide condition. This is also not the condition around the whole San Francisco Bay Area.

The city of San Francisco and County of Marin are not in a drought, their reservoirs are at or above normal levels.

Today I read that EBMUD is ending their voluntary rationing program. They are not saying we should waste water, just that there is now enough and if it is needed, go ahead and use it. Being frugal with water is always recommended. Get the most from every drop.

If we continue to conserve, we will help protect against future droughts. However, as our populations grow, our need for water is growing. It is unlikely that we can completely avoid the drought cycle, but conservation and awareness go a long way toward shortening the dry spells.

The California water system is still below normal in the largest reservoirs and therefore water districts that rely on the state water supply are still being asked to cut back.

Both Lake Oroville and the state's largest reservoir - Shasta Lake, (which can hold 4.5 million acre-feet and is part of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Central Valley Project), have not reached normal levels according to anything I have read at this time and supports the state water systems continued rationing.

The following is a snippet from a radio show:

---------------------------------------------------
"If we continue to cut back on smoke pouring forth from industrial smokestacks, the increase in global warming could be profound," Kintisch writes in an opinion piece for the Los Angeles Times. Kintisch isn't talking about greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide; he's talking about another kind of pollutant we put in the sky -- "like aerosols from a spray can," he tells NPR's Guy Raz.

"It turns out that those particles have a profound effect on maintaining the planet's temperature." Greenhouse gases and aerosol pollutants work in opposing ways on the Earth's climate, Kintisch explains. "The greenhouse gases warm the planet when they're emitted, because they absorb heat reflected up from the ground -- the greenhouse effect. These aerosols, though, do the opposite. They block sunlight, they make clouds more reflective -- and by doing that, they actually cool the planet. "The problem is that we're cutting the cooling pollution as we make our air cleaner," he says.

Some scientists, he says, are confident that this is connected to global warming, but they don't know how large the effect is. "That's the frightening thing, because if it's a big cooling effect, it means that we've been actually warming the planet more than we know," Kintisch says. "As we take away that unexpectedly helpful cooling mask, we're going to be facing more global warming than we expected.
---------------------------------------------------


I think the trick here is to think logically about what is involved. Switching hair spray and cleaning products from aerosol to a trigger pump is quick and easy compared to cutting back our driving or improving our fossil fuel efficiencies dramatically. As we make decisions to improve our quality of life, reducing airborne pollutants as one example, all of the effects are not necessarily positive. We improve our health and well being as well as general health of the other life on our planet.

As we are generally reactionary, what this tells me is it is time to react. Wow, the aerosols had more effects than killing Ozone and opening higher possibilities for skin cancer? Yes. Apparently along with killing Ozone, they reflected heat away in the upper atmosphere. We had to make this change. Now we need to move faster toward the other changes on our list. Reducing fossil fuel use.

I'm sure we will find draw backs to renewable energies too, but they are currently a lot better choice. Lets keep perspective and seek balance, reduce - reuse - recycle.

For your interest, I have placed the forcing chart from the IPCC on the related link for you to look at. The chart is a summary of primary contributors to Climate Change and the direction of their impact illustrated with margin for error.

In 1953, the Netherlands, always vulnerable to flooding, suffered a major natural disaster. The North Sea washed over half a million acres of land and killed over 1,800 people on the south-western coast.

To protect future generations from similar harm, the Dutch government embarked on one of the greatest engineering projects in history. Over the following decades, engineers constructed a flood defence system of dams, sluices, locks, dykes and storm surge barriers. The Delta Works basically shortened the Dutch coast line and turned sea estuaries into freshwater lakes.

Earlier this month, a committee comprised of representatives of all involved levels of government presented a report outlining the possible future of the south-western part of the Netherlands, a delta of estuaries, islands and peninsulas connecting several large rivers to the North Sea.

One possible future being considered is to turn the famous Dutch dikes into tidal power generators. Openings in the series of dikes would provide ideal locations for tidal power plants.

Opening water locks would also allow the tide to return to now stagnant waters, the report stated. This would be a boon to nature, because certain plants and animals, which have all but disappeared since the estuaries were closed off, can return.

Salt water has advanced far in some places, largely because of the constant dredging in the port of Rotterdam. It may improve nature to allow salt water back in the estuaries of the delta now, but the growing shortage of fresh water caused by climate change needs to be taken into account. The problem seems not so much a lack of drinking water as such, but the locations at which it can be found. "We have plenty, but we need more storage capacity," Kuijken said. "We have grown so dependent on the availability of fresh water here in the Netherlands that it would be economic suicide to change that. Fresh water is the fuel powering our economy."

Australian scientists have discovered that whale poo is not only helping ocean plant life to flourish, but also increasing the ocean's ability to absorb CO2.

Because whales' diets are made up largely of iron-rich krill (small crustaceans), their droppings are a great fertilizer for marine plants, helping them to grow like weeds (or algae).

The research suggests that if whale numbers grow, their droppings could help marine plant life flourish, thereby improving the ocean's ability to absorb carbon dioxide blamed for global warming.

Iron is a vital element in the production of marine plants, known as algae, which suck up carbon dioxide as they grow, although it is a scarce element in the "anaemic" Southern Ocean, said chemical oceanographer Andrew Bowie.

"One-third of the world's oceans are low in trace element iron," the researcher at the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre told AFP.

Bowie said whales consumed several tonnes of krill, small shrimp-like crustaceans, each day and this found its way back into the ocean via emissions from the giant mammals.

He said while the researchers were pretty confident that whale poo would contain iron, they were surprised at the high concentration, about 10 million times that of Antarctic seawater.

This weekend, one of the leisure things I did was watch the movie Avatar. While I enjoyed the special effects and the basic story line, it was clear to me that there was a message.

The message was not as simple as implying we are all connected. There was another message. In the end of the movie (spoiler alert) it is implied that the local deity has combined forces of all living creatures to stop the invasion of man. The message I get from that, just my interpretation, is that nature will eventually strike back.

Using this same train of thought, the recent volcanic eruption in the real world could be considered nature fighting back. Or we could consider it luck that the effect of the eruption will be a short global cooling and thereby give humanity some extra time to change our habits.

It is amazing to me that a movie with such a strong environmental theme could reach such popularity given the many messages rolled in. I am actually comforted that it is received this way because it means there is hope for us to do the right things.

Now, on another note, there is a company that wants to put solar panels on the roof of the white house - gratis. This is a clear publicity stunt, but I like it and I think it sets a good example for us all.