If you click over to my Environmental Resources Forum, you will see I have a request out to anyone who can help me learn from first hand experience how open source text books are working. To date, I do not have any feedback. However, there is a huge potential savings in money, paper and back strain as well as hours tracking and handling materials if e-readers and open text books both become viable as teaching aids.

For now the e-readers battery life, color rendering and notation tracking are key limitations. Amazon has just finished a real world survey at several universities and this is a summary of what was learned:

Students pulled no punches telling Amazon what they thought of its $489 e-reader. The Kindle DX failed its first test. At the University of Virginia, as many as 80% of MBA students who participated in Amazon's pilot program said they would not recommend the Kindle DX as a classroom study aid (though more than 90 percent liked it for pleasure reading). At Princeton and Reed, students complained they couldn't scribble notes in the margins, easily highlight passages, or fully appreciate color charts and graphics.

At least Amazon is asking the questions and hopefully they are also listening.

Let me first say that CNN has a great article summarizing the whole Gulf Oil Spill situation today. However, it is still a few pages long. After reading headlines, one question kept hitting me, what is this "Top Kill" procedure?

From the article I will summarize it as this: "Top Kill" referres to a process where viscous material, twice the density of water is forced into the opening creating a clog. As the material is viscous, this is not permanent and requires finishing the job with a cement cap.

The problem lies with the fact that this procedure has never been done under water, let alone 5000 feet under water. The pressure created by the weight of the water may have a direct effect on this process. The math is still being worked out, but it looks like the procedure has about a 60 to 70% chance of working.

If it fails today, the Obama administration plans to take over the operation.

There are a few big myths that people just seem to "know" are true. This should clear things up and help you save a few drops of your own fuel with habit and choice changes.

1. * It takes more fuel to start a vehicle than it does to let it idle.

~ People are really confused about this one and will leave a car idling for half an hour rather than turn it off and restart.

Idling uses a quarter- to a half-gallon of fuel in an hour (costing you one to two cents a minute). Unless you're in traffic, turn off the car when stopped for more a few minutes.

The extra squirt of fuel that went into the engine adding validity to this myth went away with the advent of fuel injection. Even then, the squirt was so small there should have been a 5 minute rule of thumb to save fuel. Of course, in the 1970's fuel was cheap and we didn't fully understand the impact of its use on the environment.


2. * Vehicles need to be warmed up before they're driven.

~ That is a long-outdated notion. Today's cars are fine being driven seconds after they're started. In fact, some luxury car makers have a recommendation that you do not idle to warm up, rather drive gently as if you are trying not to spill your coffee. The engine is at it's optimum when cruising at a steady speed and this RPM is well above an idle.


3. * As a vehicle ages, its fuel economy decreases significantly.

~ Not true. As long as it's maintained, a 10- or 15-year-old car should have like-new mileage. The key thing is maintenance -- an out-of-tune car will definitely start to decline mileage-wise.


4. * Replacing your air filter helps your car run efficiently.

~ Another outdated claim, going back to the pre-1976 carburetor days. Modern fuel-injection engines don't get significant economy benefits from a clean air filter. The electronics will adjust fuel to suit the amount of air coming in. At some point, the filter becomes clogged enough that this claim has some validity, but it has to be really really bad.


5. * After-market additives and devices can dramatically improve your fuel economy.

~ There's not much evidence that "miracle products" do much more than drain your wallet. Both the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Reports have weighed in on this. There are no top-secret 100-mpg add-ons out there. Sorry.


5. * Using premium fuel improves fuel economy.

~ You might as well write a check to BP if you believe this. Only use premium if your car specifies it. Some high performance vehicles will specify higher octane fuel to maintain the output power. Of course low quality fuel can create sediment that will aid in the demise of your vehicle too. The best way for a manufacturer to avoid these situations coming back to them as their fault is to tell you that you can only use the best stuff from a high end company. This does not mean your vehicle will blow up if you put in less than stellar fuel once in a while or even all the time. But don't expect the best performance, longest life or best fuel economy from lesser fuels.

The project that broke ground in 2004 includes a 4.6-megawatt co-generation plant. The roof is designed to capture rainwater, while floor-to-ceiling windows reduce the need for artificial lighting. In order to save 8 million to 9 million gallons of water annually, the high-rise building has waterless urinals in men's rooms and wastewater from the sinks is recycled.

The certification is also supported with the massive amounts of recycled materials that went into the construction.

This is a good example for future construction.

See more images and find out about the architects by following the related link below.

Toyota just announced that it will invest $50 million in Tesla Motors and the two companies will partner to manufacture electric vehicles to meet California's growing demand for greener cars.

Since this has been covered many places, just follow the related link below for more information.