Day to Day Green
LED By Panasonic 
Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 03:09 PM
Posted by Administrator



The Panasonic EverLED. This bulb is expected to produce the light equivalent of a 40watt incandescent for up to 19 years of regular use. The expected savings is listed as up to $23 a year on energy bills. This is great since they are expecting the bulb to sell for $40.

This is technology that we need to watch.

I could not find an article with much more information than I have shared here. The bulb is supposed to debut in Japan in October this year.


New California Energy Standard 
Monday, September 14, 2009, 10:41 AM
Posted by Administrator
Governor Schwarzenegger has vowed to veto the new legislature approved energy standard because it limits power production to inside the state only. The Governor plans to issue an executive order for 33% of the states power to be produced by renewable sources by 2020 without the in-state limit.

Either way, California will end up with the largest renewable energy standard in the country. The state is already requiring its largest utilities to get 20 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2010 - a goal none of them are likely to meet.


There May Be Some Excitement For Oil 
Friday, September 11, 2009, 10:31 AM
Posted by Administrator



Don't get the wrong idea. Oil is still generally bad as a long term energy source. We can not afford the greenhouse effect it contributes and the supplies are still finite. Even if we have made mistakes in our estimate of sites or quantities, what we do know for sure is that nature takes millions of years to create the stuff. We have used the bulk of it in less than 100 years. So even basic math should tell you we are going to run out at our current pace.

What I want to share with you today is that a new oil deposit has been found and that the pro-oil groups and naysayers will use it as an example that oil is alive and strong. This is a clear mis-conception. The oil just discovered will only prolong our current use rate by 1 month.

This is like discovering you forgot an entry in your bank register and there was rebate or refund for something you already purchased. The money is not new, just forgotton or not accounted for. Now you have an extra $10 you didn't know about. It feels like free money or a new discovery, but it was there all along. Also, it will not go far. As an extra $10 is nice and will upgrade lunch for 1 person, this oil find is similarly small when considered what we use globally.

Follow the related link to find out more from the Oil Depletion Analysis Centre (ODAC).
Reuse Items by Swapping or Borrowing 
Thursday, September 10, 2009, 01:24 PM
Posted by Administrator
Save


Websites dedicated to helping you trade what you no longer want or need. Swap books, music, DVDs, or video games via mail through Swaptree ,SwapaDVD , PaperBackSwap , SwapaCD , BookMooch, TitleTrader, Game Trading Zone.

Trade kids' stuff you no longer need at Freepeats, Kizoodle, Tots Swap Shop , Swap Baby Goods , Hand-Me-Downs or UandITrade.

Women can swap clothing and accessories at DignSwap and at Swapstyle.

One of my personal favorites around the Bay area is Craigslist.org. Another good one is Freecycle.org.

There are plenty of other sources like these. Knowing about them is half the battle, and using them is the rest. Take advantage of these, it is good for the environment and your pocketbook.


view entry ( 1 view )   |  permalink   |  related link
Greenwashing - Pretending to be Green and Environmentally Friendly 
Thursday, September 10, 2009, 10:46 AM
Posted by Administrator



OK, this is something we have all witnessed but may not know there is actually a term for it. When we see green labels on items that just don't seem to be green in any reasonable way and wonder, "how does this product help the environment"? This question we ask ourselves is probably a good indicator that something is not right and "greenwashing" may be involved. In some cases, you can be sure "greenwashing" is involved.

The product that first irked me was actually window cleaner. Yes, I still use the product. However, when my bulk supply runs out, I may refill with vinegar and a few grains of water softener. The problem is not so much the product as it is the claim. Take cars for example: Lets face it, cars do nothing to help the environment, more efficient cars just hurt it less, but most of us still depend on them. Because we depend on them, we do the next best thing and try to drive less, use more fuel efficient models and consider the impact before taking action. While this isn't perfect, it does help versus business as usual.

The label on the window cleaner bottle struck me as almost offensive. How could amonia, water and a plastic bottle be eco friendly? I buy the bulk refill to cut the plastic and transport to a minimum, but this is not a product that protects the environment. Note that the "Greenlist" logo makes no claims. This is just a logo that creates a positive image and a name that creates positive thoughts. There is nothing wrong with it. However, the purpose is clear, it creates association of positive environmental impact with the product.

SC Johnson came up with a quasi-certification mark "Greenlist tm" for ranking its own raw materials to help "families quickly identify that SC Johnson products are made with a commitment to a more positive health and environmental profile." This is the certification on the bottle! SC Johnson creates a label that seems to appear like an outside entity and places it on the product to certify the environmental friendliness! Wow.

There are plenty of other companies doing the same kinds of things. Car companies often claim to be green. We need clarification as to what the green claim identifies. There is a really good breakdown of "greenwashing" and examples on the related link below.


view entry ( 1 view )   |  permalink   |  related link

<<First <Back | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | Next> Last>>


Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools